More Details

Summary:

A large part of contemporary legal scholarship maintains the opinion that bellum iustum doctrine was never part of international law. However, the subject remains controversial. The work in hand attempts to cast new light on the longstanding bellum iustum -- bellum legale controversy in correspondence with the more recent narrative turn in international law. It is shown that any categorical denial of the just war doctrine in international law is flawed from the outset since law is value related.

Table of Contents:

• Einführung
• Die bellum iustum-Tradition und die Herkunft des ius gentium
• Das Narrativ der "Ent-Rechtlichung" der Kriegslegitimation
• Das Narrativ vom positivistischen 19. Jahrhundert
• Das Narrativ vom bellum legale
• Das Narrativ vom positiven Frieden
• Rechtfertigungsnarrative zur unilateralen Gewaltanwendung
• Das Narrativ einer internationalen Schutzverantwortung
• Das Konstitutionalisierungsnarrativ
• Das Fortschrittsnarrativ im Völkerrecht
• Der bellum iustum-Begriff im Kontext von Politik, Recht und Macht
• Schlussbetrachtung.

Author/Creator:

Dolezik, Joachim , author

Languages:

German

Language Notes:

Item content: German

Main Work:

Narrative zum Gerechten Krieg im Völkerrecht [by Dolezik, J.]

Other Related Resources:

Print version: Narrative zum Gerechten Krieg im Völkerrecht [by Dolezik, J.] (Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, [2022] — ISBN 9783428185436)

Related Series:

Schriften zum Völkerrecht; Bd. 255

Subjects:

Just war doctrine

War (International law)

Dissertation Notes:

Thesis. doctoral ― Technische Universität Dresden, 2020.

General Notes:

Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on: Print version record.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (318 pages).

Digital Characteristics:

text file

Call Numbers:

KZ6396 .D654 2022eb

ISBNs:

9783428585434 (electronic bk.)
3428585437 (electronic bk.)
9783428185436 (hbk.) [Invalid]
3428185439 (hbk.) [Invalid]

OCLC Numbers:

1345274485